Find the trust failures buyers will question after launch.
CrisisCore reviews health, wellness, legal, AI, and other sensitive-data products before launch, procurement review, or public scrutiny.
I inspect product behavior itself: collection defaults, consent flows, recovery paths, logging, export, retention, and privacy claims the system cannot yet defend. You get a short written readout with the real risks, the fix order, and the smallest useful next step.
I focus on the few product choices most likely to create legal, reputational, or buyer-facing trouble.
A short list of issues, fixes, and next moves. Written readout, not a slide deck.
To avoid expensive cleanup after launch and narrow the risk surface before buyers inspect it.
Start with the smallest useful brief: URL, launch window, and one concrete concern.
I reply with the fastest sensible entry point, the top areas to inspect first, and whether the 48-hour teardown is enough.
- • Send URL + stage + one concern.
- • Start from contact and send only the basics.
- • Skip decks and long docs.
Usually answered within 1-3 business days with fit, first checks, and suggested package.
Services
48-hour teardown
A fast first pass for teams that need a clear answer on whether a real product problem exists.
Starting at CA$250
- • Top 3 product trust risks
- • Why each risk matters
- • First fix for each issue
- • Recommendation: stop here, full review, or fix sprint
- • Short written readout
Use this when you need signal quickly and do not want to start with a full engagement.
Full review
The deeper audit for products where data handling, product behavior, and buyer scrutiny all matter.
Starting at CA$1,200
- • Threat model snapshot
- • Data boundary map
- • Collection and retention review
- • Product claims review
- • Risk-ranked fix roadmap
- • Proof gaps and buyer scrutiny notes
Use this when you need the full map of what is risky, what is sloppy, and what to fix first.
Fix Sprint
Implementation support for the highest-value corrections.
Starting at CA$1,500
- • Patch privacy or UX copy
- • Tighten data collection boundaries
- • Improve export, deletion, recovery, or consent flows
- • Add verification notes or tests where practical
- • Ship the highest-leverage corrections first
Use this when the problems are already known and you want them fixed fast.
Proof
Real product changes, not hand-wavy claims
Proof shows concrete changes in product behavior, data handling, and public claims that can be defended.
Sensitive logging stayed local by default, sharing became explicit, and failure states became easier for users to recover from.
Security claims were narrowed to what the release process could actually prove, making the product easier to defend to skeptical buyers.
A flagship case study and a redacted artifact from a real engagement.
Who This Fits
- • Post-MVP products with live users or a near-term launch
- • Sensitive personal, legal, health, or operator data
- • Founders who want concrete fixes instead of vague reassurance
- • Teams willing to reduce collection and tighten boundaries
- • Idea-stage product brainstorming
- • Generic pentest replacement expectations
- • Compliance theater with no appetite for product change
- • Teams without an owner, budget, or decision path
How It Starts
1. Send the link, stage, and deadline
Keep it short: product link, launch stage, and one clear concern.
2. I look for the issues most likely to cause damage
Not a checklist pass. I prioritize by impact on buyers, legal exposure, and launch risk.
3. You get a short written readout
Issues ranked by severity, with the first fix for each. No padding, no slide deck.
Send the link, launch stage, and one concern.
I'll tell you whether the 48-hour teardown, a full review, or no engagement makes sense.